Recent Problems with Surf Contests on the North Shore


Overview
Proposed Rules
What Went Wrong in 2001-2002
Other Concerns
Pressure for More Contests


Overview

Over the winter of 2001-2002, the public was excluded from using its surf spots on the North Shore of Oahu more than ever before.  Contests are staged at the best spots all winter long and the vast majority of surfers believe that they are not getting a fair chance to surf these places.
 
The Amended Rules governing the issuance of contest permits were adopted by Walter Ozawa, the Parks Director on October 9, 1991 and approved by Mayor Frank Fasi on October 24, 1991.  These rules amended a former set of rules established by City Ordinance in 1978.

The City and County of Honolulu Department of Parks and Recreation is responsible for issuing beach permits to run surf contests.  The State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources issues permits for use of the near shore waters.  Each permit authorizes a contest promoter to reserve up to four of the best days of surf within a limited number of days.  The public is allowed to surf whenever a contest is not in progress (i.e., the inferior days).  Permitted holding periods are scheduled at three sites, continuously from October through March.

The rules were not followed in 2001 because the City is afraid of lawsuits.  There are more groups seeking permits than there are permits to grant.  Having been sued in 1999 and 2000 over its permit award procedures, the City granted permits to all comers in 2001.  Although the City's decision making process was upheld in court, it seemed to make its decisions not on its own rules, but rather on who was likely to bring suit.  While they feared litigation from contest promoters, they were less concerned about a public backlash.  Because of the Parks Department's inability to protect the public's interests in beach access, Let's Surf Coalition was formed.

Now, it should be said that choosing between competing permit applications is not an easy task.  As an example, who should be allowed to hold a contest if three groups applying for the same permit are a men's professional surf contest, a women's professional bodyboard contest or an amateur surf contest?  The City has rules for conflict resolution, but they have been problematic and the City wants to overhaul all of the rules.

Unfortunately, the proposed rules reserve more time against the public.  A deafening outcry was heard by the Parks Department when they presented a draft of new rules at a public hearing on December 20, 2000.  The crowd made clear that the proposed rules were not acceptable.  A new draft of proposed rules , released on June 15, 2001, corrected some of the most egregious issues, but left several other unacceptable rules in place.


Proposed Rules

The biggest problem with the proposed rules is that the number of contests will increase.  At the public hearing on December 20, 2000, the public spoke loudly and clearly that, if anything, there are already too many contests.  Here are the major concerns of Let's Surf Coalition regarding the proposed rules.

Season Calendar:  The City would define the surf calendar as October through March.  Contests scheduled the week before and the week after this calendar would not be regulated by the rules.  Obviously, these are surf contests held on the North Shore and they should be including in any calculation on the number of contests.

Half Days:  Competition held for less than four hours in a day would count as a half-day.  Contests would be run over four full- days or eight half-days or any combination thereof.  The contests already get the four best days to run their event.  Allowing them to pick the best eight half-days will deprive the public of whatever few decent waves may have been left over.  

Number of Contests:  The proposal is to increase the allowable number of events per beach to five per year.  As previously mentioned, four events per beach is already a burden on the public.


What Went Wrong in 2001-2002?

Some of the rules were flagrantly violated; some of them were loosely interpreted.

Too Many Events:  Six events were scheduled at Pipeline and the combined number of contest days exceeded the limit of 16 days of competition.

Back-to-Back-to Back Events:  The rules require a "cooling-off period" of at least 10 days between a contest at any given beach.  Three event holding periods, totaling 40 days, were scheduled at Pipeline without a single day between them.

Length of Holding Period:  The rules limit a contest holding period to 15 days, except as authorized by the Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation.  The Backdoor Shootout was given an 20-day holding period.

Simultaneous Events:  The holding of two surf meets at the same time is not allowed.  One event was scheduled at Haleiwa at the same time as an event at Pipeline.  Also, The Women's Bodyboard Championship at Pipeline and the NSSA at Haleiwa shared a holding period, even though their events alternated competition days.

Conflict Resolution:  The City, whose Conflict Resolution Procedures were upheld in court, ironically chose not to exercise this part of the rules for fear that they might get sued.


Other Concerns

Many residents who live at or near contest sites complain that surf contests generate unwanted traffic congestion, illegally parked cars, tresspassers, litter and noise.  Scaffolding erected at these sites usually have large banners and signs that would not normally be allowed under the State's signage laws that prohibit billboards.


Pressure for More Contests

The City thought it could alleviate its permit headache by increasing the number of events to six per beach and by allowing two simultaneous events.  In fact, they had to allow simultaneous events in order to schedule so many more events.  The public went crazy and the City changed its plan. The last proposal would allow a simultaneous event at Mokuleia, but not amongst the other beaches.

The problem is simply a matter of supply and demand.  The number of good quality surf days is limited.  As contests become more profitable for contest promoters, their requests for more contests will increase.  Meanwhile, the total number of recreational surfers is growing and this increases demand on all surf spots for more public access.

Let's Surf Coalition wants to help find a fair balance between the competing interests.  The new rules need to balance many concerns and we need everyone's input.  Please feel free to participate in a Forum , take our Survey , visit our Guest Book and, most importatnly, Become a Supporter .  Together, we can sort this out.

Home